December 5, 2021


Only The Finest Women

The Korean heavy industry drive of 1973

The plant-level look at of an industrial coverage: The Korean weighty market generate of 1973

For the duration of the East Asian expansion wonder durations, governments were intensely involved in the economy and selectively nurtured precise industries and corporations. However, there is no definitive solution as to the success of industrial interventions (Noland and Pack 2003, Harrison and Rodriguez-Claire 2010, Den Haan et al. 2017, Rodrik 2019).

Utilizing newly digitised microdata, we revisited Korea’s industrial coverage during the 1970s (Kim et al. 2021). Relative to earlier exploration that relied on field-stage data (e.g. Lee 1996, Lane 2021), we make development in two ways. Initial, we utilise the fact that the plan targeted not only unique industries but also specific regions. This area-based mostly mother nature of the plan is very important for knowing the success of industrial coverage. 2nd, we give the to start with assessment of the sample of useful resource allocation throughout manufacturing plants for the duration of this plan period.

The coverage in concern is the 1973-1979 large and chemical marketplace generate of the Park routine. The govt released the travel in 1973 for at minimum two good reasons. First, North Korea’s military provocations and the partial pull-out of the US troops from South Korea in 1971 motivated the government to strengthen its armed forces abilities by selling defence industries and their upstream industries (Ahn and Kim 1995, Lane 2021). The other commitment was to further encourage export, with the explicit goal annual export of $10 billion. The federal government experienced been influenced by Japan’s practical experience in this regard. By switching from the classic labour-intensive, mild industries to heavy and chemical industries in 1957, Japan’s yearly export exceeded $10 billion by 1967. Federal government aid for the focused industries in Korea came in many kinds, these types of as tax incentives, subsidised lengthy-time period loans, and developing industrial complexes for them. The policy did not past. Right after the assassination of President Park in 1979, the up coming administration adopted non-public sector-led development as the main of their new economic policy, following a period of ‘rationalisation’ that was meant to undo the excessive investment decision in the weighty and chemical industries (SaKong and Koh 2010).

Determine 1 exhibits the two main instruments of the weighty sector push. Panel (a) demonstrates the productive tax costs across nine industries from Kwack (1985), who constructed them from the appropriate legislation advertising and marketing financial commitment in specific industries. For the duration of the plan period of time, there was a stark divergence in successful tax premiums involving qualified and non-qualified industries. Panel (b) demonstrates the spots of industrial complexes throughout the plan period. In February 1974, the governing administration set up the Korean Industrial Complex Company (KICOX), charged with the design of industrial internet sites and the vital infrastructure for focused industries. The govt invested 100 billion won ($247 million in 1974) in KICOX, which experienced exclusive privileges together with tax exemption, the appropriate to correct land, and the appropriate to borrow cash from abroad (SaKong and Koh 2010). 

Figure 1 Procedures concentrating on industries and areas

(a)        Effective Tax Prices

(b)       Construction of Industrial Complexes in Korea

Because the weighty marketplace generate signifies an abrupt adjust in the government’s plan direction in 1973, we utilise a big difference-in-discrepancies specification to evaluate the influence of the coverage on the focused industries/areas relative to non-targeted types. Figure 2 demonstrates how output, efficiency, and degree of misallocation have advanced otherwise in specific industries/locations as opposed to non-targeted ones. Panel (a) exhibits that output, calculated by actual price-extra, of the targeted sector-location pairs grew drastically faster than all those of the non-specific types. The differential results amongst the focused and the non-targeted business-location pairs did not adhere to a divergent pre-trend, supporting a causal interpretation. While plant-level whole issue efficiency (TFP) rose drastically for the plants in the qualified industries and locations (panel (b)), TFP at the business-location stage did not transform relative to that of the non-targeted kinds (panel (c)). The rationale is that the allocative efficiency worsened substantially within the specific industries and regions, with generation activities developing far more concentrated but not necessarily toward the vegetation with the optimum productiveness, as shown in panel (d).

Determine 2 Output, productiveness, and degree of misallocation

The misallocation was especially severe among the the plants in the qualified industries/areas that entered in the course of the policy period of time. This proof is regular with the rise of significant organization teams (identified as chaebols) and the cross-subsidisation procedures of their business enterprise units in the course of this period (SaKong and Koh 2010). A basic accounting work out pursuing Hsieh and Klenow (2009) shows that, if the diploma of misallocation in the focused industries/locations relative to the degree within just the non-qualified types had remained the exact same between 1968 and 1980, their average TFP would have been 40{3a94529b2b68d99beac25dca5c1678936e723415472492fb18744b4f77d809a2} greater in 1980.

In addition, we offer new evidence on the techniques in which industrial coverage reshapes the economic climate. First, the establishment dimensions distribution of the qualified industries and areas shifted to the correct (i.e. greater establishments), with the proper tail getting to be significantly thicker. The change is mainly accounted for by the entry of huge plants. This is consistent with what occurs in versions of engineering adoption Buera et. al. (2021), although in our info the partnership concerning plants’ productiveness and measurement turned a lot more misaligned beneath the plan. 2nd, the input-output framework of the economy developed in a way that the qualified industries substantially greater their output multipliers. To the finest of our knowledge, this is the initial proof drawing attention to the evolution of an economy’s input-output structure. Utilizing the components of Fadinger et al. (forthcoming), we estimate that this change in the enter-output composition accounted for about one particular-third of the TFP progress of the whole Korean production sector involving 1970 and 1980. In this vein, the differential affect of the coverage we identify may drastically underestimate the all round impact of the coverage on the financial system.  

So, was the Korean large field drive a achievements? Just one summary we can properly draw without a complete cost-gain evaluation is that the plan would have experienced a additional good effect if the promotion of the focused industries and areas had not arrive with a increase in concentration and misallocation in them. 

Editors’ take note: This column also appeared on VoxDev.


Ahn, C Y and J-H Kim (1995), “The outward-wanting trade policy and the industrial development of South Korea,” in D-S Cha and K S Kim (eds), The Korean Overall economy 1945-1995: Functionality and Vision for the 21st Century, Korea Growth Institute: 312-369.

Buera, F J, H Hopenhayn, Y Shin and N Trachter (2021), “Big Force in Distorted Economies,” NBER Doing work Paper No. 28561.

Den Haan W, M Ellison, E Ilzetzki, M McMahon and R Reis, (2017) “UK industrial strategy: Sights of economists on its desirability and potential clients for achievements,”, 20 February.

Fadinger, H, C Ghiglino, and M Teteryatnikova (forthcoming), “Income Differences, Productivity and Input-Output Networks,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics.

Harrison, Ann and Andres Rodriguez-Clare, “From challenging to comfortable industrial policies in developing countries,”, 27 June.

Hsieh, C-T and P J Klenow (2009), “Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 1403-1448.

Kim, M, M Lee and Y Shin (2021), “The Plant-Level Look at of an Industrial Coverage: The Korean Heavy Market Generate of 1973,” NBER Doing work Paper No. 29252.

Kwack, T (1985), “Depreciation and Money Taxation (in Korean),” Korea Growth Institute Study Report 85-05.

Lane, N (2021) “Manufacturing Revolutions: Industrial Coverage and Industrialization in South Korea,” Performing Paper.

Lee, J-W (1996), “Government interventions and productiveness expansion,” Journal of Economic Progress 1(3): 391-414.

Noland, M and H Pack (2003), Industrial policy in an era of globalization: Classes from Asia, Vol. 69, Peterson Institute.

Rodrik, Dani (2019), “Where are we in the economics of industrial policies?,”, 21 January.