December 8, 2021


Only The Finest Women

Domestic climate policy and cross-border bank lending

There is no planet B’, but for banking companies there are ‘countries B to Z’: Domestic local weather plan and cross-border bank lending

Weather change poses difficulties for economic markets and economy. Quite a few plan institutions across the earth have recognised these challenges and have been discussing how to update their mandates appropriately. For instance, the ECB (2021) has stated that it is fully commited to replicate environmental sustainability considerations in its financial plan. Likewise, the Bank of England (2021) defines its aim as to “play a leading role, via its policies and functions, in making sure the financial method, the macro-financial state, and the Financial institution of England are resilient to the pitfalls from local climate change and supportive of the transition to a net-zero economy” (see also the statements by Brunetti et al. 2021 of the Federal Reserve). These statements reveal that, in in the vicinity of future, the financial regulatory framework will go by way of an critical modify to integrate the climate improve, if not it is now happening. 

One agreement policymakers have achieved about the local weather modify is that it is a international dilemma. In line with this agreement, several central banks and supervisors set up the Community for Greening the Money Technique in 2017 with the function of helping to strengthen the world-wide response essential to meet up with the plans of the Paris agreement (Community for Greening the Economic Method 2021). Even with this effort, there is nevertheless a huge heterogeneity across international locations in conditions of weather policy stringency. In Determine 1, we plot the degrees of the Weather Transform Effectiveness Index (CCPI) produced by Germanwatch at the place level.  The map lays bare the reality that nations have distinct ranges of local climate plan stringency. This heterogeneity can be an crucial issue in the fight versus climate transform, considering that it may allow firms to circumvent the greater local weather policy stringency in their household state by shifting their functions to a lot less stringent nations. Supporting this problem, Bartram et al. (2021) doc that fiscally constrained firms shifted emissions and output from California to other US states after the introduction of cap-and-trade programme in California.   

Determine 1 Country averages of weather plan

Take note: Countries with no color shade are not portion of the sample. 

In a current paper (Benincasa et al. 2021), we analyse irrespective of whether banks exploit this heterogeneity in climate policy stringency across nations. Extra precisely, we investigate regardless of whether financial institutions use cross-border lending to react to increased local weather plan stringency in their household nations around the world. From the literature, we know that cross-border lending is an critical transmitter of shocks among the countries (Cetorelli and Goldberg 2011, Giannetti and Laeven 2012, Ongena et al. 2015, Claessens 2017, Hale et al. 2020, Doerr and Schaz 2021). Thus, banking institutions may well raise their cross-border lending when confronted with a lot more stringent local weather policy in their property place.    

We obtain that banks do indeed react to better climate plan stringency in their house state by expanding their cross-border lending. As an illustration of our conclusions, Determine 2 shows a potent favourable partnership between cross-border mortgage ratios on lender stability sheets and house nation local climate policy stringency. Our regression investigation indicates a big result: banking institutions improve their shares in cross-border syndicated financial loans by 10{3a94529b2b68d99beac25dca5c1678936e723415472492fb18744b4f77d809a2} if policy of their residence place increases by exact level seasoned in the US concerning 2007 and 2017. Overall, our success depict a distinct photograph in which banking companies use cross-border lending as a regulatory arbitrage device against climate policies, which may lower the efficiency of these types of guidelines. 

Determine 2 Property nation climate policy and cross-border financial institution lending

As indicated right before, our measure of climate plan stringency is the CCPI (designed by Germanwatch e.V. with the aim of tracking endeavours to battle weather change in 57 countries and the EU). As argued by Delis et al. (2019), a evaluate for the stringency of region local climate plan should really account for the two the ambition and the hard work of the govt plan itself. The former is calculated by the efficiency of the policy, while the latter is measured by the success of the coverage in achieving certain outcomes. As a result, offering a comprehensive picture of countries’ climate security motion endeavours, the CCPI has been utilized by other scientific tests to evaluate countries’ local weather policy stringency (Delis et al. 2019, Atanasova and Schwartz 2019, Lin et al. 2020). The CCPI comes with two major benefits. First, currently being a weighted ordinary of 14 distinctive climate coverage indicators, the CCPI is a broad and inclusive assessment of the countries’ weather coverage stringency. Next, it facilitates local weather policy comparison of nations around the world with various backgrounds as it summarises the discrepancies with just one metric. We combine the CCPI with syndicated bank loan info, which we use to evaluate financial institution cross-border lending. Syndicated loans are one particular of the main equipment for cross-border lending (De Haas and Van Horen 2013). In addition, syndicated financial loans make cross-border lending simpler for smaller sized banking companies too, as the direct arranger of a syndicated financial loan can consider steps to reduce the information asymmetries. Therefore, a blend of the CCPI collection and syndicated bank loan information gives us with a applicable setting to look into no matter if banking institutions change their cross-border lending to react to a change in local weather plan stringency.

A regression design in which shares in cross-border loans are regressed on CCPI can account for the effects of mortgage demand from customers and other country-degree variables, in addition to the influence of CCPI. For instance, observing an boost in the CCPI of a state, a organization may increase its bank loan need to the banking institutions from that state. This can come about as the company may want to use the romance with a lender from a high CCPI place as a signalling gadget. In the same way, this improve in mortgage demand from customers can be driven by firm’s desire to raise its knowledge in efforts from local weather alter and a lending romance with this lender can deliver this know-how. These arguments suggest that with no thoroughly managing for mortgage demand from customers, the relationship involving the CCPI and cross-border lending can not be interpreted in phrases of the personal loan source. In our most popular specification, we handle for all personal loan need pushed aspects, this kind of as borrowers’ and loans’ qualities, and establish an impact that reflects banks’ financial loan source.

In addition to the bank loan demand, place-stage qualities that are correlated with both climate policy stringency and cross-border lending can generate a bias in our estimations. For occasion, an enhancement in economic problems can guide to an raise in both of those the CCPI and cross-border lending, or a change in demographics of the country can have an effect on the CCPI by altering the notion of the local climate alter and cross-border lending by affecting bank loan demand. To mitigate this kind of issues, we acquire details about place amount economic disorders, society, legal surroundings, and demographics and include these variables into our products. Our effects do not improve when we manage for these variables.

We locate evidence supportive of the aforementioned mechanism – i.e. the maximize in cross-border lending is driven by a regulatory arbitrage by exploiting the heterogeneity amid the loan providers. To start with, we doc that the optimistic outcome of climate policy stringency on cross-border lending happens only if the household nation of the financial institution has a a lot more stringent climate policy as opposed with the borrower’s country. This finding signifies that the banks use the cross-border lending as a gadget to mitigate the results of the weather coverage considering that it demonstrates that banking companies increase their cross-border lending selectively. 2nd, we come across that banking institutions that are envisioned to have interaction with cross-border lending as a response to weather coverage stringency are in fact the ones who are more probable to do so. For instance, the magnitude of the result is appreciably larger for the banks that have bigger cross-border loans in their textbooks and for banking companies that experience a higher non-executing loans ratio (NPL). A better cross-border loans ratio implies that the lender has more expertise with cross-border lending, which suggests that it is a lot easier for this financial institution to use cross-border lending to respond to variations in domestic climate policy stringency. A higher NPL ratio produces a more powerful incentive for the bank to interact with cross-border lending due to the fact additional stringent local climate policy can reduce the returns of the financial loans when the lender requirements a higher return charge owing to the substantial NPL ratio.

We proceed our investigation by inspecting which class of the CCPI is a lot more critical for the cross-border lending. The CCPI has four types: greenhouse fuel emissions, renewable power, strength use, and weather coverage. Estimating horse-race regression designs that features these 4 groups, we uncover that local climate coverage is the most important category for cross-border lending. This indicates that banking institutions respond to the true actions taken by the respective domestic governments, alternatively of the realised outcomes of these actions in phrases of emissions for example. This obtaining also lends assistance to our interpretation that the underlying mechanism of our findings is capturing regulatory arbitrage.  

General, our paper supplies two most important new insights. Initially, banks may be having steps to lower the impact of weather coverage stringency on their bank loan portfolio. Next, the heterogeneity in climate coverage stringency among the nations around the world can induce cross-border lending because of to regulatory arbitrage prospects it makes, which signifies that lack of homogeneity in the polices for local weather improve can reduce the usefulness of such laws by a financial institution lending channel. 


Atanasova, C and E S Schwartz(2019), “Stranded fossil gasoline reserves and business price,” NBERWorking Paper No. 26497. 

Bank of England (2021), “Weather improve”. 

Bartram, S M, K Hou, and S Kim (2021), “Real results of local weather plan: Economic constraints and spillovers,” Journal of Fiscal Economics.

Benincasa, E, G Kabaș, and S Ongena (2021), “There is no world B”, but for banking institutions there are “countries B to Z”: Domestic weather policy and cross-border bank lending”, CEPR Discussion Paper 16665.

Brunetti, C, B Dennis, D Gates, D Hancock, D Ignell, E K Kiser, G Kotta, A Kovner, R J Rosen and N K Tabor (2021), “Climate Adjust and Economic Stability”, FEDS Notes, 19 March. 

Cetorelli, N and L S Goldberg (2011), “Global banks and international shock transmission: Proof from the crisis”, IMF Economic Review, 59(1): 41-76.

Claessens, S (2017), “Global banking: The latest developments and insights from exploration,” Review of Finance, 21(4): 1513-1555.

De Haas, R and N Van Horen (2013), “Running for the exit? Worldwide lender lending through a financial disaster,” The Review of Monetary Scientific studies, 26(1), 244-285.

Delis, M D, de K Greiff and S Ongena (2019), “Being stranded with fossil gas reserves? Weather policy danger and the pricing of financial institution loans”, EBRD Operating Paper No. 231.

Doerr, S and P Schaz (2021), “Geographic diversification and financial institution lending for the duration of crises,” Journal of Economic Economics, 140(3): 768-788.

ECB (2021), “ECB offers motion program to consist of weather transform issues in its financial policy strategy”, press launch, 8 July. 

Giannetti, M and L Laeven (2012), “The flight home influence: Evidence from the syndicated personal loan marketplace all through economical crises,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 104(1): 23-43.

Hale, G, Kapan and C Minoiu (2020), “Shock transmission by way of cross-border bank lending: Credit rating and real results,” The Critique of Fiscal Reports, 33(10): 4839-4882.

Karolyi, G A and A G Taboada (2015), “Regulatory arbitrage and cross‐border bank acquisitions,” The Journal of Finance, 70(6): 2395-2450.

Lin, C, T Schmid and M S Weisbach (2020), “Climate Alter and Company Investments: Proof from Prepared Electrical power Plants”, Fisher University of Company Functioning Paper, (2019-03), 026.

Network for Greening the Economical Procedure (2021), “Origin and intent”. 

Ongena, S, J L Peydró and N Van Horen (2015), “Shocks overseas, pain at residence? Lender-agency-stage evidence on the intercontinental transmission of money shocks,” IMF Economic Overview, 63(4): 698-750.

Ongena, S, A Popov and G F Udell (2013), ““When the cat’s absent the mice will play”: Does regulation at house have an affect on lender danger-having abroad?” Journal of Economical Economics, 108(3): 727-750.